| Info Board • Men were more bank kamo spend 840,000 returned aft |
| 31.10.2013, 02:56 - jfdsip5z05 - Anfänger - 1 Posts Lee did not do so, never dared to use to for their own use, to the owner home after refusing to return. May 24, 2005 afternoon, Li Jun to the bank to get the money later, inquired about their account balances, cash machine out of the figures on the daylights scared him on the card is actually more out of 840,000 yuan for no reason. Think there might be nothing, Li began little by little withdraw money from the card, a few months after all the money taken out. January 14, 2008, the Guangdong Provincial High Court to remand the case to clear facts on the grounds. Criminal law theory, Lost and forgotten about for the same thing, without distinction, are Embezzlement Crime. April 24, 2007, Xu Ting resigned from his job in Guangzhou, absconded with money. January 16, 2008, the court mediation, Li reached an agreement with the banks: Bank of 840,000 yuan and Li Jun restitution case of legal fees, travel expenses, interest and other expenses Total 893,797.32 yuan,sakaeya-auto.co.jp/cgi-bin/c-002/sa-bbs/visit/main.pl?page_num=1, June 30, 2008 to return 40 Accordingly, the Court finally concluded that Xu Ting actual theft amounting to RMB 17.3826 million. At first, Li repayment very positive, according to the agreement the bank has 40 million. Unjust enrichment should be returned, so the huge sum of money shall be returned to banks. Helpless, sandy areas of the bank to court for enforcement. Two years after the original bank to recover money, the bank received an autonomous unit reflects the arrival of the 2005 sum of 840,000 yuan for two years after the money has not arrived yet, the banks began to investigate the matter. end up in court mediation, bank card Master Li Jun (a pseudonym) will be used by installments, with interest return of this ill-gotten gains. The nature of his actions rise from civil matters for alleged embezzlement, criminal matter. Wu explained that the Penal Code refers to the illegal occupation of criminal possession for the purpose of others to keep their belongings forgotten treasure trove of illegal material, or for himself, a relatively large amount, refused to surrender behavior. Tension and anxiety in Jun waiting for someone to come to money, he also repeatedly check bank accounts, 840,woolrich,000 yuan has been still in his card. So, he did not move a point. million,www.gao-fa.com/bbs/home.php?mod=space&uid=213630, the remaining funds in July 2009 returned completed. Initially, Li also do not want the money, the bank then has sued to Urumqi sand district court. deduction of 174 yuan,cgi.www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~takatsu/cgi-bin/sunbbs.cgi?mode=form&no=193&page=, not be regarded as theft. (Text characters as a pseudonym) Xu Ting replay in 2006, Xu Ting came to Guangzhou Huangpu Avenue,louboutin, Tianhe District,abercrombie, a bank ATM cash machine withdrawals. As Xuting first withdrawal of 1,000 yuan, it is normal withdrawals,bbs.99sobao.com/thread-366558-1-1.html, ATM failure due to inadvertently extracted, it is not recognized by the court as theft, while the remaining one hundred and seventy times withdrawals, ATMs in its bank account automatically After that, he will be one part of the money to invest in their own mechanical parts sales, the remaining money is brought back to his hometown in Fujian, to buy land to build a house,mulberry sale, and soon married with his girlfriend. In this way, a month later, still no one to find him. In the court of the Executive Board, under the mediation again, the two sides reached a settlement agreement: Li Jun from March 2010 onwards at least monthly to the bank also two million, to April 30,gai168.com/home.php?mod=space&uid=453642, 2011 to pay off all of the remaining funds. In the capital injection, the Li Jun has been improvement in the business of Urumqi, Urumqi, and he is and from Fujian,woolrich, take care of business. Scared and afraid of Jun baffled, and finally come to this conclusion: who might be mistakenly hit the money on their own account, that person certainly will soon find the whereabouts of the money and want to go back. Banks will hit 840,000 yuan Lin wrong bank card, this 840,000 yuan bank lost property should be considered. A year later, Xu Ting was arrested in Baoji Railway Station. February 22, 2008, Xu Ting case in Guangzhou City Intermediate People's Court retrial hearing. But later, he began to delay repayment time. Unjust enrichment should be returned to the implementation of the case Urumqi sand mediation District Court Judge Wu Executive Board, said Li Jun, a bank card suddenly out of large sums of money out of 840,broadcastlouder.com/2013/05/brand-visibility-domination-on-google-in-six-weeks-and-how-i-did-it/#comment-205623,000 yuan, is the civil law of unjust enrichment. 's Court understands this sandy area along the bank staff operational errors lead to money being wrong sink case, Play money records show the year, remittances unit in the bank in order to pass a 840,000 yuan deposit way transfer checks deposited into an autonomous unit of account, the results Bank staff mistakenly credited to Jun's sales department. Court nevertheless finds Xuting constitute theft and sentenced her to five years in prison and a fine of 20,000 yuan,www.realkobe.com/parfaitamour/bbs/aska.cgi, and restitution from the bank ATM machine out of 17.3826 million yuan. November 29, 2007, the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court of First Instance sentenced him to life imprisonment for theft. The so-called unjust enrichment is no legal basis or after the loss of a person to suffer a lawful basis to obtain benefits. Results Xu Ting found out 1,000 yuan,smglzh.com/bbs/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1922190&extra=, the bank card account only deducted 1 yuan;, totaling 175,000 yuan. Bank staff came to Fujian to find Li Jun, asking them to return when mistakenly scored his account of the money and the resulting losses. Who is this money, how will appear on my card Xu Ting case reported by the media, public opinion in China caused widespread social concern and controversy. Withdrawals beginning dared Jun 32 year old home in Fujian, in 2003 came to Urumqi from operating a home construction machinery parts sales, business has been no improvement, barely. One to two to go, the past two years, Li has gradually faded away windfall origins until one day in 2007, a bank staff Urumqi suddenly appeared in front of him. |