| fezdmwqf |
| Hohlbratze |
 |
 |
| 908 Posts |
| registered: 26.10.2013 |
|
Beeching was not all detrimental to the railways The Argus
There wasn't any way in which many of the lines could have survived whether Beeching had written his statement or not. They were overstaffed, ineffective, antiquated and inferior.
Indeed some lines,parajumpers kodiak, like the Dyke Railway as well as the service to Midhurst, had sealed many years before Beeching was asked by Pm Harold Macmillan to modernise the railways.
It's tempting to look back again on the old train system as being ideal. The reality was different. Some stations only saw about six trains a day and they also were often unbelievably slow.
A vast armed service of workers has been employed to look after rural lines and channels. Many of them had couple of tasks to perform,www.sandlunds.se/parajumper/.
It could not be allowed to keep on as it was however the Beeching solution was ferocious. It closed traces such as the link between Shoreham and Horsham through Steyning that did not will need much to make them lucrative.
It was also inefficient, leaving places including his home town, East Grinstead, stranded at the end of a railway culdesac.
The main lines were improved while he had suggested plus some routes like the Colonial line bear evaluation with much vaunted lines in continental European countries.
But many people, such as me, thought that the majority of the British railway system was condemned.
I remember walking for the Bluebell Railway some time inside the Sixties soon after this had closed when the British Train track was still in position, thinking how sad it was that educates would never seen generally there again.
How completely wrong can you be? Fans restored the line and also reopened the section in between Sheffield Park and Horsted Keynes in a short time, making it one of the first improved railways.
Now they have just extended the line to be able to East Grinstead, where it is going to once again link up with the national rail system. Dr Beeching would have raised a wry smile during this.
After a period of drop the railways nationally have been reinvigorated and on some traces passenger numbers possess doubled in a 10 years.
The problem on collections like the London Brighton course is how to run ample trains on them.
Opening up the Thameslink line inside the Eighties was a excellent move, providing an email finder service right through London.
There is however an urgent should create more capacity on the Brighton line southern of Three Links. Some relief has been written by running longer trains but major long term measures are needed.
It's difficult to create extra monitors because of the need for tunnels at Clayton and Balcombe and yet another viaduct over the River Ouse.
Nonetheless it might be possible to build passing loops using some places so that rapidly trains are not caught up behind those halting at every station.
Several politicians, including Brighton Kemptown MP Simon Kirby and Lord Bassam associated with Brighton are backing strategies for a second main line veering off the Far east Coastway towards Uckfield.
While this would be a useful diversion option I question whether it would be much quicker than the present diversion along the Arun Area line.
Reopening the Steyning line would probably be more powerful, although there are issues with houses and highways having been built about parts of the track bed.
|
